The Case For Remote Data Collection

Here are a few myths and truths about the ability to gather representative, quality insights by speaking directly to end-customers on the phone.

We are often asked about the differences between remote versus in-person data collection. The data speaks for itself – remote surveying provides a cost-effective, high speed alternative to in-person data collection without sacrificing the quality and rigor of the research!

Below are 3 myths about remote data collection that we discuss in our report, and a quick snapshot of why they are false.

Myth #1: Data tends to be less accurate when gathered remotely

False! A study conducted in 2016 published by the World Bank found in-person and phone responses were aligned and accurate. The respondents, owners of microenterprises did not change their behavior based on the medium.

Myth #2: Remote survey methods are just as costly as in-person

False! The same study cited above demonstrates significant cost savings when opting for remote data collection methods.

Myth #3: Research using remote data collection can’t be published as academic, peer-reviewed studies

False! A study published by Science Advances in February 2021 – Falling Living Standards during the COVID-19 Crisis: Quantitative evidence from nine developing countries relied on remote data collection.

To learn more about the validity of remote data collection, including a case study, click on the link below to read the report.

Let's talk

We help you understand your social performance by listening to your customers, suppliers, employees or beneficiaries.
Get in touch

Latest Insights

Tune into The Volume, our monthly newsletter

By signing up to the 60 Decibels mailing list, you consent to your data being collected and stored in line with our privacy policy